Page 93 - 2016-2021-ISU
P. 93

(b) Interrogation

              (1) The term “interrogation” shall be defined to mean the questioning

         of an employee who, at the time of such questioning appears to be a likely
         or potential target or subject for disciplinary action.

              (2) If  an employee is  improperly subjected  to  an interrogation in
         violation of the  provisions of this subdivision, an arbitrator  appointed

         pursuant to this Article shall have the authority to exclude information
         obtained thereby or other evidence derived solely  through such

         interrogation.  The State shall have the burden of proof to show that, upon
         the preponderance of the evidence, such evidence sought to be introduced

         was not derived solely by reason of such interrogation and was obtained
         independently from the  statements or evidence so provided by the

         employee.
              (3) No employee shall be required to submit to an interrogation by a

         department or agency (a) if the information sought is for use against such
         employee in a disciplinary proceeding pursuant to this Article, or (b) after

         a notice of discipline has been served on such employee, or (c) after the
         employee’s resignation has been requested pursuant to Article 35, unless

         such employee is notified in advance of the interrogation that he or she has
         the right to have CSEA representation, as defined in Section 33.2(a)(2) -

         Representation - or private counsel provided at his or her own expense
         present or to decline such representation and that, if such representation is

         requested, a reasonable period of time will be afforded for that purpose.  If
         the employee requests representation and the CSEA or employee fails to

         provide such representation within a reasonable time, the interrogation may

         proceed.  An arbitrator under this Article shall have the power to find that
         a delay in providing such representation may have been unreasonable.
               (c) Recording Devices/Transcripts

              No recording devices or stenographic or other record shall be used

         during an interrogation unless the employee (1) is advised in advance that
         a transcript  is  being  made,  and  (2)  is  offered  the  right  to  have  CSEA
         representation,  as defined in Section 33.2(a)(2)  -  Representation  -  or

         private counsel provided at his or her own expense present.  Unless the

         employee declines such representation, he or she will be given a reasonable
         period of time to obtain  representation.  If  the employee requests

         representation  and the CSEA  or employee fails  to provide  such


                                                            92
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98