Page 77 - 2016-2021-ASU
P. 77

if the affected permanent employee declines a displacement opportunity

         pursuant to his/her displacement rights as provided for in Civil Service Law

         Sections 80 and 80-a, in his or her county of residence or county of current
         work location.

            (c)(2) An affected permanent employee who elects a transition benefit as
         provided for in Section 22.1(b) above shall be eligible for placement on

         preferred lists and reemployment rosters as provided for in Civil Service
         Law Sections 81 and 81-a and other applicable Civil Service Laws, Rules

         and Regulations.
            §22.2 No permanent employee will suffer reduction in existing salary as

         a result of reclassification or reallocation of the position the employee holds
         by permanent appointment.

            §22.3 A State/CSEA Employment Security Committee shall jointly study
         and attempt to resolve matters of mutual concern regarding work force

         planning, which may include the joint recommendation of demonstration
         projects  to  address  identified  issues,  and  to  review  matters  relative  to

         redeployment of employees affected by the State’s exercise of its right to
         contract out.   The Committee  is not intended to be policy-making  or

         regulatory in nature; rather, it is intended to be advisory on matters of work
         force planning.  Matters of mutual concern include, but are not limited to:

            (1)  identification,  research,  development  and  implementation  of  work
         force planning strategies;

            (2) fostering effective work force stabilization by utilization of attrition
         and the establishment of long and short-term human resource goals;

            (3) the concept of exploring alternative State employment for employees

         who become permanently disabled from the performance of their duties;
            (4) establishment of a skills inventory system that can expand placement
         alternatives for new or existing job opportunities;

            (5) study and develop procedures and programs to facilitate training and

         retraining alternatives  aimed at  responding  to changes and work force
         requirements, new technology and promoting work force stabilization;

            (6) examination of employment security models in the public sector in
         relation to their potential application to New York State.

            The parties recognize that work force planning is a workplace issue.  As
         such, a cooperative working relationship will be encouraged between all

         State employee negotiating units and the State.


                                                            76
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82